Sensory Evaluation of Lighting: A Methodological Pilot

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Sensory Evaluation of Lighting : A Methodological Pilot. / Boork, Magdalena; Nordén, Johan; Nilsson Tengelin, Maria; Wendin, Karin.

I: LEUKOS - Journal of Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, Bind 18, Nr. 1, 2022, s. 66-82.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Boork, M, Nordén, J, Nilsson Tengelin, M & Wendin, K 2022, 'Sensory Evaluation of Lighting: A Methodological Pilot', LEUKOS - Journal of Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, bind 18, nr. 1, s. 66-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2020.1813037

APA

Boork, M., Nordén, J., Nilsson Tengelin, M., & Wendin, K. (2022). Sensory Evaluation of Lighting: A Methodological Pilot. LEUKOS - Journal of Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, 18(1), 66-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2020.1813037

Vancouver

Boork M, Nordén J, Nilsson Tengelin M, Wendin K. Sensory Evaluation of Lighting: A Methodological Pilot. LEUKOS - Journal of Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. 2022;18(1):66-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2020.1813037

Author

Boork, Magdalena ; Nordén, Johan ; Nilsson Tengelin, Maria ; Wendin, Karin. / Sensory Evaluation of Lighting : A Methodological Pilot. I: LEUKOS - Journal of Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. 2022 ; Bind 18, Nr. 1. s. 66-82.

Bibtex

@article{b3d5b7e964bf41f4a558498ca934a49e,
title = "Sensory Evaluation of Lighting: A Methodological Pilot",
abstract = "Current standards for light environments are based on technical requirements, e.g. luminance, uniformity, and illuminance, and do not necessarily describe all parts of the light experience to ensure visual comfort from a user perspective. Including experience-related requirements would most likely yield better lighting comfort. To do that, new methods for specifying and measuring the user experience are needed. This paper describes a pilot study exploring a new method to analytically assess perceived lighting properties by using a trained human panel and thus make human assessments more objective. The methodology is built on established sensory methods, where the human senses are used in product assessments, traditionally applied within e.g. the food, packaging, and car industries. An analytical panel comprising eight persons fulfilling specific selection criteria were recruited and trained to assess lighting products in a multi-sensory laboratory. The results show that the panelists were able to assess lighting by distinguishing between attributes and products. Significant differences were identified between the different luminaires, both in terms of sensory and physical properties, e.g. readability and glare. Conclusively, analytical sensory methods can be applied to lighting to assess luminaires in a non-subjective way. Physical and sensory attributes do not, however, always co-vary, which shows that data from physical and sensory measuring methods provide complementary information about light quality. This knowledge may in turn be applied in tools supporting the communication between different professions in lighting design and procurement to promote light environments that are both energy efficient and desirable from an end-user perspective.",
keywords = "Lighting assessment, perception, sensory analysis, trained sensory panel, analytical assessment",
author = "Magdalena Boork and Johan Nord{\'e}n and {Nilsson Tengelin}, Maria and Karin Wendin",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1080/15502724.2020.1813037",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "66--82",
journal = "LEUKOS - Journal of Illuminating Engineering Society of North America",
issn = "1550-2724",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensory Evaluation of Lighting

T2 - A Methodological Pilot

AU - Boork, Magdalena

AU - Nordén, Johan

AU - Nilsson Tengelin, Maria

AU - Wendin, Karin

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Current standards for light environments are based on technical requirements, e.g. luminance, uniformity, and illuminance, and do not necessarily describe all parts of the light experience to ensure visual comfort from a user perspective. Including experience-related requirements would most likely yield better lighting comfort. To do that, new methods for specifying and measuring the user experience are needed. This paper describes a pilot study exploring a new method to analytically assess perceived lighting properties by using a trained human panel and thus make human assessments more objective. The methodology is built on established sensory methods, where the human senses are used in product assessments, traditionally applied within e.g. the food, packaging, and car industries. An analytical panel comprising eight persons fulfilling specific selection criteria were recruited and trained to assess lighting products in a multi-sensory laboratory. The results show that the panelists were able to assess lighting by distinguishing between attributes and products. Significant differences were identified between the different luminaires, both in terms of sensory and physical properties, e.g. readability and glare. Conclusively, analytical sensory methods can be applied to lighting to assess luminaires in a non-subjective way. Physical and sensory attributes do not, however, always co-vary, which shows that data from physical and sensory measuring methods provide complementary information about light quality. This knowledge may in turn be applied in tools supporting the communication between different professions in lighting design and procurement to promote light environments that are both energy efficient and desirable from an end-user perspective.

AB - Current standards for light environments are based on technical requirements, e.g. luminance, uniformity, and illuminance, and do not necessarily describe all parts of the light experience to ensure visual comfort from a user perspective. Including experience-related requirements would most likely yield better lighting comfort. To do that, new methods for specifying and measuring the user experience are needed. This paper describes a pilot study exploring a new method to analytically assess perceived lighting properties by using a trained human panel and thus make human assessments more objective. The methodology is built on established sensory methods, where the human senses are used in product assessments, traditionally applied within e.g. the food, packaging, and car industries. An analytical panel comprising eight persons fulfilling specific selection criteria were recruited and trained to assess lighting products in a multi-sensory laboratory. The results show that the panelists were able to assess lighting by distinguishing between attributes and products. Significant differences were identified between the different luminaires, both in terms of sensory and physical properties, e.g. readability and glare. Conclusively, analytical sensory methods can be applied to lighting to assess luminaires in a non-subjective way. Physical and sensory attributes do not, however, always co-vary, which shows that data from physical and sensory measuring methods provide complementary information about light quality. This knowledge may in turn be applied in tools supporting the communication between different professions in lighting design and procurement to promote light environments that are both energy efficient and desirable from an end-user perspective.

KW - Lighting assessment

KW - perception

KW - sensory analysis

KW - trained sensory panel

KW - analytical assessment

U2 - 10.1080/15502724.2020.1813037

DO - 10.1080/15502724.2020.1813037

M3 - Journal article

VL - 18

SP - 66

EP - 82

JO - LEUKOS - Journal of Illuminating Engineering Society of North America

JF - LEUKOS - Journal of Illuminating Engineering Society of North America

SN - 1550-2724

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 255158045