Review of ecosystem services in a bio-based circular economy and governance mechanisms

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Review of ecosystem services in a bio-based circular economy and governance mechanisms. / Cong, Rong Gang; Thomsen, Marianne.

I: Ecosystem Services, Bind 50, 101298, 08.2021.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Cong, RG & Thomsen, M 2021, 'Review of ecosystem services in a bio-based circular economy and governance mechanisms', Ecosystem Services, bind 50, 101298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101298

APA

Cong, R. G., & Thomsen, M. (2021). Review of ecosystem services in a bio-based circular economy and governance mechanisms. Ecosystem Services, 50, [101298]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101298

Vancouver

Cong RG, Thomsen M. Review of ecosystem services in a bio-based circular economy and governance mechanisms. Ecosystem Services. 2021 aug.;50. 101298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101298

Author

Cong, Rong Gang ; Thomsen, Marianne. / Review of ecosystem services in a bio-based circular economy and governance mechanisms. I: Ecosystem Services. 2021 ; Bind 50.

Bibtex

@article{9cde440e74a349ebb6965faca996e676,
title = "Review of ecosystem services in a bio-based circular economy and governance mechanisms",
abstract = "This paper reviews the literature relating to a type of local bio-based circular economy (BCE) where food waste (FW) is effectively recycled to advanced bio-refineries to produce multiple ecosystem services (ES) including energy, biofertilizer and other value-added products and services. The biofertilizer is applied within urban and peri-urban farms to close the bioresource loop. Such BCE concept has been proposed in several EU countries with varying degree of success in long-term operations. We systematically review the ES of BCE and identify the ES, which are not properly compensated by the market. On this basis, we further review the potential regulatory and supporting mechanisms, which could incentivize the successful implementation of BCE and overcome the market/policy failures. We find that single regulatory instrument at the government and authority level could be compromised by poor governance and practices at other levels, and therefore may not reach its full potential. Instead, we propose a multi-level regulatory and supporting system, which combines the strengths of top-down and bottom-up governances and motivates the self-governance of industry and citizens. We conclude by highlighting a need for multi-level governance research supporting urban sustainable transitions, with a focus on constructing {\textquoteleft}policy portfolios{\textquoteright} from a systems perspective to better engage government, firms, citizens and other stakeholders.",
author = "Cong, {Rong Gang} and Marianne Thomsen",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2021",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101298",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
journal = "Ecosystem Services",
issn = "2212-0416",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Review of ecosystem services in a bio-based circular economy and governance mechanisms

AU - Cong, Rong Gang

AU - Thomsen, Marianne

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Elsevier B.V.

PY - 2021/8

Y1 - 2021/8

N2 - This paper reviews the literature relating to a type of local bio-based circular economy (BCE) where food waste (FW) is effectively recycled to advanced bio-refineries to produce multiple ecosystem services (ES) including energy, biofertilizer and other value-added products and services. The biofertilizer is applied within urban and peri-urban farms to close the bioresource loop. Such BCE concept has been proposed in several EU countries with varying degree of success in long-term operations. We systematically review the ES of BCE and identify the ES, which are not properly compensated by the market. On this basis, we further review the potential regulatory and supporting mechanisms, which could incentivize the successful implementation of BCE and overcome the market/policy failures. We find that single regulatory instrument at the government and authority level could be compromised by poor governance and practices at other levels, and therefore may not reach its full potential. Instead, we propose a multi-level regulatory and supporting system, which combines the strengths of top-down and bottom-up governances and motivates the self-governance of industry and citizens. We conclude by highlighting a need for multi-level governance research supporting urban sustainable transitions, with a focus on constructing ‘policy portfolios’ from a systems perspective to better engage government, firms, citizens and other stakeholders.

AB - This paper reviews the literature relating to a type of local bio-based circular economy (BCE) where food waste (FW) is effectively recycled to advanced bio-refineries to produce multiple ecosystem services (ES) including energy, biofertilizer and other value-added products and services. The biofertilizer is applied within urban and peri-urban farms to close the bioresource loop. Such BCE concept has been proposed in several EU countries with varying degree of success in long-term operations. We systematically review the ES of BCE and identify the ES, which are not properly compensated by the market. On this basis, we further review the potential regulatory and supporting mechanisms, which could incentivize the successful implementation of BCE and overcome the market/policy failures. We find that single regulatory instrument at the government and authority level could be compromised by poor governance and practices at other levels, and therefore may not reach its full potential. Instead, we propose a multi-level regulatory and supporting system, which combines the strengths of top-down and bottom-up governances and motivates the self-governance of industry and citizens. We conclude by highlighting a need for multi-level governance research supporting urban sustainable transitions, with a focus on constructing ‘policy portfolios’ from a systems perspective to better engage government, firms, citizens and other stakeholders.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101298

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101298

M3 - Review

AN - SCOPUS:85107861790

VL - 50

JO - Ecosystem Services

JF - Ecosystem Services

SN - 2212-0416

M1 - 101298

ER -

ID: 297007501