Comparison of machine learning approaches for the classification of elution profiles
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Comparison of machine learning approaches for the classification of elution profiles. / Baccolo, Giacomo; Yu, Huiwen; Valsecchi, Cecile; Ballabio, Davide; Bro, Rasmus.
I: Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, Bind 243, 105002, 2023.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of machine learning approaches for the classification of elution profiles
AU - Baccolo, Giacomo
AU - Yu, Huiwen
AU - Valsecchi, Cecile
AU - Ballabio, Davide
AU - Bro, Rasmus
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Hyphenated chromatography is among the most popular analytical techniques in omics related research. While great advancements have been achieved on the experimental side, the same is not true for the extraction of the relevant information from chromatographic data. Extensive signal preprocessing is required to remove the signal of the baseline, resolve the time shifts of peaks from sample to sample and to properly estimate the spectra and concentrations of co-eluting compounds. Among several available strategies, curve resolution approaches, such as PARAFAC2, ease the deconvolution and the quantification of chemicals. However, not all resolved profiles are relevant. For example, some take into account the baseline, others the chemical compounds. Thus, it is necessary to distinguish the profiles describing relevant chemistry. With the aim to assist researchers in this selection phase, we have tried three different classification algorithms (convolutional and recurrent neural networks, k-nearest neighbours) for the automatic identification of GC-MS elution profiles resolved by PARAFAC2. To this end, we have manually labelled more than 170,000 elution profiles in the following four classes: ‘Peak’, ‘Cutoff peak’,’ Baseline’ and ‘Others’ in order to train, validate and test the classification models. The results highlight two main points: i) neural networks seem to be the best solution for this specific classification task confirmed by the overall quality of the classification, ii) the quality of the input data is crucial to maximize the modelling performances.
AB - Hyphenated chromatography is among the most popular analytical techniques in omics related research. While great advancements have been achieved on the experimental side, the same is not true for the extraction of the relevant information from chromatographic data. Extensive signal preprocessing is required to remove the signal of the baseline, resolve the time shifts of peaks from sample to sample and to properly estimate the spectra and concentrations of co-eluting compounds. Among several available strategies, curve resolution approaches, such as PARAFAC2, ease the deconvolution and the quantification of chemicals. However, not all resolved profiles are relevant. For example, some take into account the baseline, others the chemical compounds. Thus, it is necessary to distinguish the profiles describing relevant chemistry. With the aim to assist researchers in this selection phase, we have tried three different classification algorithms (convolutional and recurrent neural networks, k-nearest neighbours) for the automatic identification of GC-MS elution profiles resolved by PARAFAC2. To this end, we have manually labelled more than 170,000 elution profiles in the following four classes: ‘Peak’, ‘Cutoff peak’,’ Baseline’ and ‘Others’ in order to train, validate and test the classification models. The results highlight two main points: i) neural networks seem to be the best solution for this specific classification task confirmed by the overall quality of the classification, ii) the quality of the input data is crucial to maximize the modelling performances.
KW - Automatic analysis
KW - Chromatography
KW - Neural networks
KW - PARAFAC2
U2 - 10.1016/j.chemolab.2023.105002
DO - 10.1016/j.chemolab.2023.105002
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85175461308
VL - 243
JO - Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems
JF - Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems
SN - 0169-7439
M1 - 105002
ER -
ID: 372829500