Domestic support and the Doha development agenda: an exercise in political economy

Research output: Working paperResearch

Standard

Domestic support and the Doha development agenda : an exercise in political economy. / Zobbe, Henrik; Jensen, Hans Grinsted.

Copenhagen : Fødevareøkonomisk Institut, Københavns Universitet, 2005. p. 1-24.

Research output: Working paperResearch

Harvard

Zobbe, H & Jensen, HG 2005 'Domestic support and the Doha development agenda: an exercise in political economy' Fødevareøkonomisk Institut, Københavns Universitet, Copenhagen, pp. 1-24.

APA

Zobbe, H., & Jensen, H. G. (2005). Domestic support and the Doha development agenda: an exercise in political economy. (pp. 1-24). Fødevareøkonomisk Institut, Københavns Universitet. FOI Working Paper Vol. 2005 No. 7

Vancouver

Zobbe H, Jensen HG. Domestic support and the Doha development agenda: an exercise in political economy. Copenhagen: Fødevareøkonomisk Institut, Københavns Universitet. 2005, p. 1-24.

Author

Zobbe, Henrik ; Jensen, Hans Grinsted. / Domestic support and the Doha development agenda : an exercise in political economy. Copenhagen : Fødevareøkonomisk Institut, Københavns Universitet, 2005. pp. 1-24 (FOI Working Paper; No. 7, Vol. 2005).

Bibtex

@techreport{0dfa0ee0a1bf11ddb6ae000ea68e967b,
title = "Domestic support and the Doha development agenda: an exercise in political economy",
abstract = "Following the July 2004 Framework, this paper suggest that regardless of low or high level of reductions, Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, the European Union, and United States have problems with both Total AMS and the overall base level of Total Trade Distorting Domestic Support. When recent policy reforms and likely changes such as the Agenda 2000, the Midterm Review Reform, the proposed sugar reform in the European Union and the farm bills of 1996 and 2002 in the United States are taken into account, it becomes clear that both the European Union and the United States would be able to accommodate low or moderate reductions in both Total AMS and Total Trade Distorting Domestic Support. In respect of high reductions, further domestic reforms would be needed for both the European Union and the United States.",
keywords = "Former LIFE faculty, Domestic Support, Aggregate Measurement of Support, World Trade Organization",
author = "Henrik Zobbe and Jensen, {Hans Grinsted}",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
series = "FOI Working Paper",
publisher = "F{\o}devare{\o}konomisk Institut, K{\o}benhavns Universitet",
number = "7",
pages = "1--24",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "F{\o}devare{\o}konomisk Institut, K{\o}benhavns Universitet",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Domestic support and the Doha development agenda

T2 - an exercise in political economy

AU - Zobbe, Henrik

AU - Jensen, Hans Grinsted

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Following the July 2004 Framework, this paper suggest that regardless of low or high level of reductions, Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, the European Union, and United States have problems with both Total AMS and the overall base level of Total Trade Distorting Domestic Support. When recent policy reforms and likely changes such as the Agenda 2000, the Midterm Review Reform, the proposed sugar reform in the European Union and the farm bills of 1996 and 2002 in the United States are taken into account, it becomes clear that both the European Union and the United States would be able to accommodate low or moderate reductions in both Total AMS and Total Trade Distorting Domestic Support. In respect of high reductions, further domestic reforms would be needed for both the European Union and the United States.

AB - Following the July 2004 Framework, this paper suggest that regardless of low or high level of reductions, Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, the European Union, and United States have problems with both Total AMS and the overall base level of Total Trade Distorting Domestic Support. When recent policy reforms and likely changes such as the Agenda 2000, the Midterm Review Reform, the proposed sugar reform in the European Union and the farm bills of 1996 and 2002 in the United States are taken into account, it becomes clear that both the European Union and the United States would be able to accommodate low or moderate reductions in both Total AMS and Total Trade Distorting Domestic Support. In respect of high reductions, further domestic reforms would be needed for both the European Union and the United States.

KW - Former LIFE faculty

KW - Domestic Support, Aggregate Measurement of Support, World Trade Organization

M3 - Working paper

T3 - FOI Working Paper

SP - 1

EP - 24

BT - Domestic support and the Doha development agenda

PB - Fødevareøkonomisk Institut, Københavns Universitet

CY - Copenhagen

ER -

ID: 7969333