Choice of Ultrafilter Affects Recovery Rate of Bacteriophages

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Choice of Ultrafilter Affects Recovery Rate of Bacteriophages. / Larsen, Frej; Offersen, Simone Margaard; Li, Viktoria Rose; Deng, Ling; Nielsen, Dennis Sandris; Rasmussen, Torben Sølbeck.

In: Viruses, Vol. 15, No. 10, 2051, 2023.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Larsen, F, Offersen, SM, Li, VR, Deng, L, Nielsen, DS & Rasmussen, TS 2023, 'Choice of Ultrafilter Affects Recovery Rate of Bacteriophages', Viruses, vol. 15, no. 10, 2051. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15102051

APA

Larsen, F., Offersen, S. M., Li, V. R., Deng, L., Nielsen, D. S., & Rasmussen, T. S. (2023). Choice of Ultrafilter Affects Recovery Rate of Bacteriophages. Viruses, 15(10), [2051]. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15102051

Vancouver

Larsen F, Offersen SM, Li VR, Deng L, Nielsen DS, Rasmussen TS. Choice of Ultrafilter Affects Recovery Rate of Bacteriophages. Viruses. 2023;15(10). 2051. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15102051

Author

Larsen, Frej ; Offersen, Simone Margaard ; Li, Viktoria Rose ; Deng, Ling ; Nielsen, Dennis Sandris ; Rasmussen, Torben Sølbeck. / Choice of Ultrafilter Affects Recovery Rate of Bacteriophages. In: Viruses. 2023 ; Vol. 15, No. 10.

Bibtex

@article{311593e2b29d418598dcbd9b76b2aeaa,
title = "Choice of Ultrafilter Affects Recovery Rate of Bacteriophages",
abstract = "Studies into the viral fraction of complex microbial communities, like in the mammalian gut, have recently garnered much interest. Yet there is still no standardized protocol for extracting viruses from such samples, and the protocols that exist employ procedures that skew the viral community of the sample one way or another. The first step of the extraction pipeline often consists of the basic filtering of macromolecules and bacteria, yet even this affects the viruses in a strain-specific manner. In this study, we investigate a protocol for viral extraction based on ultrafiltration and how the choice of ultrafilter might influence the extracted viral community. Clinical samples (feces, vaginal swabs, and tracheal suction samples) were spiked with a mock community of known phages (T4, c2, Φ6, Φ29, Φx174, and Φ2972), filtered, and quantified using spot and plaque assays to estimate the loss in recovery. The enveloped Φ6 phage is especially severely affected by the choice of filter, but also tailed phages such as T4 and c2 have a reduced infectivity after ultrafiltration. We conclude that the pore size of ultrafilters may affect the recovery of phages in a strain- and sample-dependent manner, suggesting the need for greater thought when selecting filters for virus extraction.",
keywords = "bacteriophage, ultrafiltration, virome, virus purification, VLP",
author = "Frej Larsen and Offersen, {Simone Margaard} and Li, {Viktoria Rose} and Ling Deng and Nielsen, {Dennis Sandris} and Rasmussen, {Torben S{\o}lbeck}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 by the authors.",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.3390/v15102051",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
journal = "Viruses",
issn = "1999-4915",
publisher = "M D P I AG",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Choice of Ultrafilter Affects Recovery Rate of Bacteriophages

AU - Larsen, Frej

AU - Offersen, Simone Margaard

AU - Li, Viktoria Rose

AU - Deng, Ling

AU - Nielsen, Dennis Sandris

AU - Rasmussen, Torben Sølbeck

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 by the authors.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Studies into the viral fraction of complex microbial communities, like in the mammalian gut, have recently garnered much interest. Yet there is still no standardized protocol for extracting viruses from such samples, and the protocols that exist employ procedures that skew the viral community of the sample one way or another. The first step of the extraction pipeline often consists of the basic filtering of macromolecules and bacteria, yet even this affects the viruses in a strain-specific manner. In this study, we investigate a protocol for viral extraction based on ultrafiltration and how the choice of ultrafilter might influence the extracted viral community. Clinical samples (feces, vaginal swabs, and tracheal suction samples) were spiked with a mock community of known phages (T4, c2, Φ6, Φ29, Φx174, and Φ2972), filtered, and quantified using spot and plaque assays to estimate the loss in recovery. The enveloped Φ6 phage is especially severely affected by the choice of filter, but also tailed phages such as T4 and c2 have a reduced infectivity after ultrafiltration. We conclude that the pore size of ultrafilters may affect the recovery of phages in a strain- and sample-dependent manner, suggesting the need for greater thought when selecting filters for virus extraction.

AB - Studies into the viral fraction of complex microbial communities, like in the mammalian gut, have recently garnered much interest. Yet there is still no standardized protocol for extracting viruses from such samples, and the protocols that exist employ procedures that skew the viral community of the sample one way or another. The first step of the extraction pipeline often consists of the basic filtering of macromolecules and bacteria, yet even this affects the viruses in a strain-specific manner. In this study, we investigate a protocol for viral extraction based on ultrafiltration and how the choice of ultrafilter might influence the extracted viral community. Clinical samples (feces, vaginal swabs, and tracheal suction samples) were spiked with a mock community of known phages (T4, c2, Φ6, Φ29, Φx174, and Φ2972), filtered, and quantified using spot and plaque assays to estimate the loss in recovery. The enveloped Φ6 phage is especially severely affected by the choice of filter, but also tailed phages such as T4 and c2 have a reduced infectivity after ultrafiltration. We conclude that the pore size of ultrafilters may affect the recovery of phages in a strain- and sample-dependent manner, suggesting the need for greater thought when selecting filters for virus extraction.

KW - bacteriophage

KW - ultrafiltration

KW - virome

KW - virus purification

KW - VLP

U2 - 10.3390/v15102051

DO - 10.3390/v15102051

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 37896828

AN - SCOPUS:85174969624

VL - 15

JO - Viruses

JF - Viruses

SN - 1999-4915

IS - 10

M1 - 2051

ER -

ID: 372705967