On the meaningfulness of testing preference axioms in stated preference discrete choice experiments

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

On the meaningfulness of testing preference axioms in stated preference discrete choice experiments. / Hougaard, Jens Leth; Tjur, Carl Tue; Østerdal, Lars Peter Raahave.

In: European Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 13, 2012, p. 409–417.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Hougaard, JL, Tjur, CT & Østerdal, LPR 2012, 'On the meaningfulness of testing preference axioms in stated preference discrete choice experiments', European Journal of Health Economics, vol. 13, pp. 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-011-0312-4

APA

Hougaard, J. L., Tjur, C. T., & Østerdal, L. P. R. (2012). On the meaningfulness of testing preference axioms in stated preference discrete choice experiments. European Journal of Health Economics, 13, 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-011-0312-4

Vancouver

Hougaard JL, Tjur CT, Østerdal LPR. On the meaningfulness of testing preference axioms in stated preference discrete choice experiments. European Journal of Health Economics. 2012;13:409–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-011-0312-4

Author

Hougaard, Jens Leth ; Tjur, Carl Tue ; Østerdal, Lars Peter Raahave. / On the meaningfulness of testing preference axioms in stated preference discrete choice experiments. In: European Journal of Health Economics. 2012 ; Vol. 13. pp. 409–417.

Bibtex

@article{4a5cc970004b44bea12237378990116c,
title = "On the meaningfulness of testing preference axioms in stated preference discrete choice experiments",
abstract = "A stream of studies on evaluation of health care services and public goods have developed tests of the preference axioms of completeness and transitivity and methods for detecting other preference phenomena such as unstability, learning- and tiredness effects, and random error, in stated preference discrete choice experiments. This methodological paper tries to identify the role of the preference axioms and other preference phenomena in the context of such experiments and discusses whether or howsuch axioms and phenomena can be subject to meaningful (statistical) tests.",
keywords = "Former LIFE faculty, Faculty of Social Sciences, stated preference discrete choice experiments, Completeness , Transitivity",
author = "Hougaard, {Jens Leth} and Tjur, {Carl Tue} and {\O}sterdal, {Lars Peter Raahave}",
note = "JEL Classification: B41; C52; D01",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1007/s10198-011-0312-4",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "409–417",
journal = "European Journal of Health Economics",
issn = "1618-7598",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the meaningfulness of testing preference axioms in stated preference discrete choice experiments

AU - Hougaard, Jens Leth

AU - Tjur, Carl Tue

AU - Østerdal, Lars Peter Raahave

N1 - JEL Classification: B41; C52; D01

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - A stream of studies on evaluation of health care services and public goods have developed tests of the preference axioms of completeness and transitivity and methods for detecting other preference phenomena such as unstability, learning- and tiredness effects, and random error, in stated preference discrete choice experiments. This methodological paper tries to identify the role of the preference axioms and other preference phenomena in the context of such experiments and discusses whether or howsuch axioms and phenomena can be subject to meaningful (statistical) tests.

AB - A stream of studies on evaluation of health care services and public goods have developed tests of the preference axioms of completeness and transitivity and methods for detecting other preference phenomena such as unstability, learning- and tiredness effects, and random error, in stated preference discrete choice experiments. This methodological paper tries to identify the role of the preference axioms and other preference phenomena in the context of such experiments and discusses whether or howsuch axioms and phenomena can be subject to meaningful (statistical) tests.

KW - Former LIFE faculty

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - stated preference discrete choice experiments

KW - Completeness

KW - Transitivity

U2 - 10.1007/s10198-011-0312-4

DO - 10.1007/s10198-011-0312-4

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 21544605

VL - 13

SP - 409

EP - 417

JO - European Journal of Health Economics

JF - European Journal of Health Economics

SN - 1618-7598

ER -

ID: 33625234