A review on oral tactile sensitivity: measurement techniques, influencing factors and its relation to food perception and preference

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Standard

A review on oral tactile sensitivity : measurement techniques, influencing factors and its relation to food perception and preference. / Liu, Jing; Cattaneo, Camilla; Papavasileiou, Maria; Methven, Lisa; Bredie, Wender L.P.

In: Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 100, 104624, 2022.

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Liu, J, Cattaneo, C, Papavasileiou, M, Methven, L & Bredie, WLP 2022, 'A review on oral tactile sensitivity: measurement techniques, influencing factors and its relation to food perception and preference', Food Quality and Preference, vol. 100, 104624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104624

APA

Liu, J., Cattaneo, C., Papavasileiou, M., Methven, L., & Bredie, W. L. P. (2022). A review on oral tactile sensitivity: measurement techniques, influencing factors and its relation to food perception and preference. Food Quality and Preference, 100, [104624]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104624

Vancouver

Liu J, Cattaneo C, Papavasileiou M, Methven L, Bredie WLP. A review on oral tactile sensitivity: measurement techniques, influencing factors and its relation to food perception and preference. Food Quality and Preference. 2022;100. 104624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104624

Author

Liu, Jing ; Cattaneo, Camilla ; Papavasileiou, Maria ; Methven, Lisa ; Bredie, Wender L.P. / A review on oral tactile sensitivity : measurement techniques, influencing factors and its relation to food perception and preference. In: Food Quality and Preference. 2022 ; Vol. 100.

Bibtex

@article{cea56c0c7fef41e4889d4387502f8ea0,
title = "A review on oral tactile sensitivity: measurement techniques, influencing factors and its relation to food perception and preference",
abstract = "Texture perception and mouthfeel are important factors in food acceptance and rejection. Despite the contribution of oral tactile sensation to perception of food texture, it has been understudied. This review addresses oral tactile sensitivity in relation to measurement methods, factors that influence sensitivity, and its association with texture perception and preference. Notably, the advantages and disadvantages of different testing methods are discussed, including the two-point discrimination task (or two-pin test), the grating orientation test, the letter-identification test, point pressure sensitivity by filaments, and discrimination tests for specific aspects of texture. The effects of age, sex, fungiform papillae, ethnicity, pathological changes and other physiological measures on oral tactile sensitivity are also reviewed. The oral tactile sensitivity tends to decline with advanced age in healthy adults; some pathological changes may have negative influence on the tactile sensitivity; however, the effect of several other factors are contradictory in the literature. Regarding the association between oral tactile sensitivity and texture perception and food preferences, it is suggested that the sensitivity measured by techniques such as the two-point discrimination task or a grating orientation task typically represents a single dimension of texture perception and thus is difficult to link directly to perception of other texture dimensions. The sensitivity to specific texture attributes such as thickness might predict texture perception and preference. The review stresses the importance of further research in oral tactile sensitivity and its role in the perception and liking of various food textures.",
keywords = "Individual variation, Lingual tactile acuity, Oral sensitivity, Texture perception, Texture preference",
author = "Jing Liu and Camilla Cattaneo and Maria Papavasileiou and Lisa Methven and Bredie, {Wender L.P.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104624",
language = "English",
volume = "100",
journal = "Food Quality and Preference",
issn = "0950-3293",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A review on oral tactile sensitivity

T2 - measurement techniques, influencing factors and its relation to food perception and preference

AU - Liu, Jing

AU - Cattaneo, Camilla

AU - Papavasileiou, Maria

AU - Methven, Lisa

AU - Bredie, Wender L.P.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Texture perception and mouthfeel are important factors in food acceptance and rejection. Despite the contribution of oral tactile sensation to perception of food texture, it has been understudied. This review addresses oral tactile sensitivity in relation to measurement methods, factors that influence sensitivity, and its association with texture perception and preference. Notably, the advantages and disadvantages of different testing methods are discussed, including the two-point discrimination task (or two-pin test), the grating orientation test, the letter-identification test, point pressure sensitivity by filaments, and discrimination tests for specific aspects of texture. The effects of age, sex, fungiform papillae, ethnicity, pathological changes and other physiological measures on oral tactile sensitivity are also reviewed. The oral tactile sensitivity tends to decline with advanced age in healthy adults; some pathological changes may have negative influence on the tactile sensitivity; however, the effect of several other factors are contradictory in the literature. Regarding the association between oral tactile sensitivity and texture perception and food preferences, it is suggested that the sensitivity measured by techniques such as the two-point discrimination task or a grating orientation task typically represents a single dimension of texture perception and thus is difficult to link directly to perception of other texture dimensions. The sensitivity to specific texture attributes such as thickness might predict texture perception and preference. The review stresses the importance of further research in oral tactile sensitivity and its role in the perception and liking of various food textures.

AB - Texture perception and mouthfeel are important factors in food acceptance and rejection. Despite the contribution of oral tactile sensation to perception of food texture, it has been understudied. This review addresses oral tactile sensitivity in relation to measurement methods, factors that influence sensitivity, and its association with texture perception and preference. Notably, the advantages and disadvantages of different testing methods are discussed, including the two-point discrimination task (or two-pin test), the grating orientation test, the letter-identification test, point pressure sensitivity by filaments, and discrimination tests for specific aspects of texture. The effects of age, sex, fungiform papillae, ethnicity, pathological changes and other physiological measures on oral tactile sensitivity are also reviewed. The oral tactile sensitivity tends to decline with advanced age in healthy adults; some pathological changes may have negative influence on the tactile sensitivity; however, the effect of several other factors are contradictory in the literature. Regarding the association between oral tactile sensitivity and texture perception and food preferences, it is suggested that the sensitivity measured by techniques such as the two-point discrimination task or a grating orientation task typically represents a single dimension of texture perception and thus is difficult to link directly to perception of other texture dimensions. The sensitivity to specific texture attributes such as thickness might predict texture perception and preference. The review stresses the importance of further research in oral tactile sensitivity and its role in the perception and liking of various food textures.

KW - Individual variation

KW - Lingual tactile acuity

KW - Oral sensitivity

KW - Texture perception

KW - Texture preference

U2 - 10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104624

DO - 10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104624

M3 - Review

AN - SCOPUS:85130363597

VL - 100

JO - Food Quality and Preference

JF - Food Quality and Preference

SN - 0950-3293

M1 - 104624

ER -

ID: 310574711